Chat
Computer Science · MapleScholar Plus

The Semantics of Thought: Formal Mathematical Semantics for Neurosymbolic AI

Deep neural networks excel at statistical intuition while symbolic systems master formal deductive logic; formulating unified categorical semantics bridges neural vector embeddings with formal symbolic reasoning provers.

Author
Garcez, Artur d'Avila et al.
Published
2025
Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Last updated
September 2026
The Semantics of Thought: Formal Mathematical Semantics for Neurosymbolic AI

Artificial intelligence stands divided into two rival paradigms: connectionist deep neural networks that learn statistical patterns from data, and symbolic logic engines that manipulate explicit concepts with mathematical certitude.

While neural models hallucinate and fail at basic multi-step deduction, symbolic systems cannot handle perceptual noise or learn from unstructured sensory data.

This foundational theoretical paper establishes formal algebraic and categorical semantics for neurosymbolic deep learning. The authors formulate a unified mathematical language that maps continuous neural latent spaces directly onto discrete symbolic logic trees, proving compositionality and soundness across hybrid representations.

Unifying neural representations with formal semantics lays the theoretical foundation for trustworthy artificial intelligence, enabling verifiable AI copilots for scientific discovery, automated theorem proving, and critical safety validation.

Reference

Garcez, A. d'A., & Odense, S. (2025). Neurosymbolic Deep Learning Semantics (Version 1). arXiv.

Title

Neurosymbolic Deep Learning Semantics

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a powerful new language of science as evidenced by recent Nobel Prizes in chemistry and physics that recognized contributions to AI applied to those areas. Yet, this new language lacks semantics, which makes AI's scientific discoveries unsatisfactory at best. With the purpose of uncovering new facts but also improving our understanding of the world, AI-based science requires formalization through a framework capable of translating insight into comprehensible scientific knowledge. In this paper, we argue that logic offers an adequate framework. In particular, we use logic in a neurosymbolic framework to offer a much needed semantics for deep learning, the neural network-based technology of current AI. Deep learning and neurosymbolic AI lack a general set of conditions to ensure that desirable properties are satisfied. Instead, there is a plethora of encoding and knowledge extraction approaches designed for particular cases. To rectify this, we introduced a framework for semantic encoding, making explicit the mapping between neural networks and logic, and characterizing the common ingredients of the various existing approaches. In this paper, we describe succinctly and exemplify how logical semantics and neural networks are linked through this framework, we review some of the most prominent approaches and techniques developed for neural encoding and knowledge extraction, provide a formal definition of our framework, and discuss some of the difficulties of identifying a semantic encoding in practice in light of analogous problems in the philosophy of mind.

Cited 0 times · View on doi.org

Continue

Continue Exploring

Ask this paper your own questions, or keep browsing the verified research catalogue.