Chat
Arts and Humanities · MapleScholar Plus

The Quantum Present: Reconciling the Flow of Time with Einstein's Relativity

Einstein's theory of relativity abolished universal cosmic simultaneity, relegating the 'present moment' to a subjective human illusion; spatio-temporal indeterminism and branching space-times construct a rigorous, relativity-proof definition of the present.

Author
Thomas Müller
Published
2019
Journal
Foundations of Physics
Last updated
September 2026
The Quantum Present: Reconciling the Flow of Time with Einstein's Relativity

Human beings experience time as an active, unfolding flow: the past is settled, the future is open, and reality happens in the present moment.

However, Einstein's special and general relativity showed that the simultaneity of distant events is relative to the observer's motion, leading physicists to embrace the 'block universe' where past, present, and future coexist eternally.

This paper in Foundations of Physics introduces an ontologically objective definition of the present through spatio-temporal indeterminism. Utilizing branching space-times and local indeterministic quantum events, the authors prove that an objective frontier of becoming can coexist with the local invariance of relativity.

Formulating a relativity-proof notion of time bridges quantum indeterminism with gravitational geometry, offering profound theoretical insights for quantum gravity and the physics of temporal consciousness.

Reference

Müller, T. (2019). Defining a Relativity-Proof Notion of the Present via Spatio-temporal Indeterminism. Foundations of Physics, 50(6), 644–664.

Title

Defining a Relativity-Proof Notion of the Present via Spatio-temporal Indeterminism

Abstract

In this paper we describe a novel approach to defining an ontologically fundamental notion of co-presentness that does not go against the tenets of relativity theory. We survey the possible reactions to the problem of the present in relativity theory, introducing a terminological distinction between a static role of the present, which is served by the relation of simultaneity, and a dynamic role of the present, with the corresponding relation of co-presentness. We argue that both of these relations need to be equivalence relations, but they need not coincide. Simultaneity, the sharing of a temporal coordinate, need not have fundamental ontological import, so that a relativizing strategy with respect to simultaneity seems promising. The notion of co-presentness, on the other hand, does have ontological import, and can therefore not be relativized to an observer or to an arbitrarily chosen frame. We argue that a formal representation of indeterminism can provide the structure needed to anchor the relation of co-presentness, and that this addition is in fact congenial to the notion of dynamic time as requiring real (indeterministic) change. The resulting picture is one of an extended dynamic present, implying a formal distinction between static (coordinate) simultaneity and dynamic co-presentness. After working out the basics of our approach in the simpler framework of branching time, we provide our full analysis in the framework of branching space-times, which allows for a formal definition of modal correlations. The spatial extension of the dynamic present can reach as far as the modal correlations do. In the limit, the dynamic present could extend across a maximal space-like hypersurface.

Cited 16 times · View on doi.org

Continue

Continue Exploring

Ask this paper your own questions, or keep browsing the verified research catalogue.